Agenda and minutes

None.

To confirm the minutes of the previous meetings held on 11 December 2024 and 5 February 2025.

It had been noted that there was a typographical error within the minutes of 11 December 2024, at item PC15, whereby the resolution read that “the minutes of the meeting held on 11 December 2024 be confirmed and signed by the Chair”.  This date should have read “23 October 2024”.

Members proposed, seconded and agreed amendment of the date in the minutes of the 11 December to reflect that the minutes of the meeting held on 23 October 2024 be signed and confirmed by the Chair.

The Committee were asked to approve the amended minutes of the 11 December 2024 and the minutes of the meeting held on 5 February 2025.

Upon being put to the vote it was, unanimously:

RESOLVED – that the minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committees held on 11 December 2024 and 5 February 2025 be confirmed and signed by the Chair.

None.

None.

Please note that the order in which applications are heard may be changed at the meeting.  If Members have queries about any of the applications, they are requested to raise them with the relevant Planning Officer prior to the Committee meeting.

Members had received a schedule of planning applications to be determined by the Committee and fully considered each report.

This was an application for the conversion of 2no. barns to 2no. dwellings at Barns to the rear of 28 Woodhouse Lane, Horsehay, Telford, Shropshire.

Dawley Hamlets Parish Council had requested that the application be determined by the Planning Committee.

The Planning Officer set out that the application sought full planning permission for the conversion of 2 barns to the rear of the application site.

Cllr Z Hannington, Dawley Hamlets Parish Council, spoke against the application and raised concerns regarding poor road infrastructure and parked cars which exacerbated the issues, poor visibility, increased traffic, noise, loss of privacy, the inadequacy of the footings of the barns which may need underpinning, drainage and the impact on pedestrians and the safety of residents.  Further concerns were raised in regards to the change in dynamics of the road following the closure of the shop and the impact the new proposal would have on the surrounding highway network.

Mr J Harris, Applicant’s Agent, spoke in favour of the application and highlighted that there were no objections to the application from technical consultees.  The conversion of the barn did not increase the height or volume of the current buildings and the proximity to existing properties remained the same.  In relation to parking, ten parking spaces had now been proposed for use by number 27 and 28 and would also serve the barns.   Porous materials would be used to surface the car park which would mitigate any additional rain water.  It was suggested that a “H” bar be implemented to ensure that access was maintained.  Additional highways impact had been assessed as minimal and the visibility splays acceptable.  The application brought forward existing buildings which would contribute to the Local Plan housing target and there was a biodiversity net gain of 10%.   There were no technical grounds to refuse the application.

The Planning Officer informed Members that the application was in the built up area where the principle of development was considered acceptable.  The existing barns would be converted into dwellings which fell modestly behind the build line and were currently in an existing redundant state and it was an effective reuse of non-designated heritage assets.  The site was large enough to accommodate the amenity space and the off road parking scheme and was not considered to be overdevelopment.  Permitted development rights would be removed.  The existing buildings were capable of conversion without modification with some new windows and doors and the design was considered in keeping with the local character and appearance.  Current landscaping and boundary treatments would remain and would be suitably conditioned.  Further landscaping details and a landscaping management plan would be required.  Ten parking spaces had been demonstrated with a turning area and an area for delivery vehicles, and the spaces allowed sufficient turning area to exit in a forward gear.  External alterations were minimal and it was not considered to be detrimental or harmful to neighbouring properties.  Structural stability would be assessed further by building regulations and a construction management plan  ...  view the full minutes text for item PC34